Monday, 11 February 2013

The Government’s Adoption Map for the UK

Children of the United Kingdom's Children's Mi...
Children of the United Kingdom's Children's Migrant Programme (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The UK government recently released a map of the country’s local authorities, colour coded to indicate the number of children in each authority that are eligible for, and in need of, adoption. The map demonstrates the areas of the country that are therefore struggling to recruit enough adoptive parents to meet demand and the government hopes that this will encourage more to come forward. Consequently it is perhaps an opportune time to take a quick look at what adoption in the UK actually entails and why the government deems it necessary to take this course of action.

What is Adoption?
As mentioned, these latest developments concern the number of children that are in need of adoption. This means children that are in need of parents who will be required to assume full parental rights over them and to take this responsibility on as a lifetime commitment. A child who is adopted becomes a fully integrated and permanent member of that family and in the eyes of the law hold the same status, rights and protection as a child would by birth. Indeed, at the point a child is adopted, the birth/original parents relinquish their parental relationship and effectively cease to be the child’s parents in any legal context.

The concept of adoption is notably distinct from that of fostering where a foster parent cares for a child who is need of a secure home on a temporary basis. Although children may be in foster care for varying periods of time, the intention with fostering is always to return the child to their parent’s home as soon as possible, if possible. The birth/original parent remains the child’s legal parent and the foster parent becomes a temporary guardian.

Barriers to Adoption
The permanency of adoption introduces a number of factors which affect the ability to find suitable adoptive parents with which to place children. The fact that the prospective adopters must be willing themselves to make this lifetime commitment, and take on both the financial and emotional challenges that that brings, will limit the number of parents coming forward to adopt in the first place. Importantly, however, the stakes are also increased in regard to the welfare of the child, which is the ultimate concern with adoption. As a consequence there is a need for greater emphasis to be placed on making sure the parents and children are suitable matches and will subsequently be happy as a family. This is, of course, a concern in any scenario when placing a child with carers, but has even greater importance with adoption. It is the job of adoption agencies to ensure that the adoptive parents have come to terms with the commitment and that the child will be happy and secure with suitable parents for the rest of their lives.

With the higher stakes, there is a risk that the processes involved in qualifying for adoption and then placing individual children can be exhaustive and create too many administrative, practical and emotional obstacles; dissuading parents from entering the process, and preventing children from exiting care and finding settled families.

Upcoming Changes
As the government’s new map helps to demonstrate, there are currently more children waiting to be adopted than prospective adopters and so the challenge facing the government and agencies is to appeal to more parents/families to come forward, to enter the process, whilst ensuring that the necessary safeguards are in place to protect both the child and the adopters wellbeing.

To this end the government are looking towards a few initiatives to raise the profile of the adoption issues in the UK and make the process easier for parents to enter the pool of prospective adopters. The map is one stage in this. Parents can now see the scale of the shortfall in adoptive families in their local area by seeing the number of children who are eligible for adoption but still awaiting a suitable family. Hopefully, this may encourage those who may have been under an illusion that the chances of being successful in their applications was remote because of the competition they may have faced.

The map however is part of a wider initiative which also involves a new adoption hotline funded by the Department for Education but run by charities and staffed by people with first hand experience of the adoption process. The hotline aims to make it easier for prospective adoptive parents to access the information they need as well as to navigate their way through their applications. In addition, the government is planning to launch a new website, “Gateway for Adoption” later in the year which will aim to be just that and put parents into contact with the relevant agencies as they embark on their adoption journeys.

For those looking for legal advice in regard to the adoption process and other childcare related matters you can click here.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 7 February 2013

London’s Other Rivers - Central & East London

Nouormand: Pliaque à Londres
Nouormand: Pliaque à Londres (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The third part of this article introduces two more rivers which empty into the Thames from the north. The first could be seen to be the most important river, the River Thames aside, in the capital’s history, the River Walbrook. The other is a river which still flows as London’s second river and which has fallen into the spotlight again in 2012, the River Lea.

Walbrook
To the east of the Fleet, running through the City of London, the River Walbrook is one of London’s most influential lost rivers, arguably the most influential. In times passed, it would have risen in modern-day Finsbury (or possibly even further north in Shoreditch) and flowed through the city of London (under the city walls - one possible root of its name) and into the Thames near what is now Cannon Street Railway Bridge.

Like the Fleet, it can trace a history of settlement back to at least the Roman era and the Roman settlement formed where the two rivers would have met, 150 metres inland from the modern bank of the Thames, would have included a strategic port, temples (e.g., the temple of Mithras whose remains can still be seen nearby - although not in their original location) and government buildings. This important strategic town went by the name of Londinium and so, in other words, the settlement that was the origin of the capital city that we know today. The future global city grew up either side if the brook on the north bank of the Thames, up the slopes of what is now Ludgate (to the west) and Cornhill (to the east).

Being at the heart of Londinium, the river has therefore witnessed many significant episodes in the history of the capital and the country as a whole, but, as a smaller watercourse, it was always susceptible to development. Having deteriorating to an open sewer in the middle ages, the river was first covered in the mid 15th century and within a hundred years or so the entire stretch of the river within the city had been built upon. The modern river has been incorporated into the sewerage system since its construction in the mid 19th century.

Lea/Lee
London’s second river, the River Lea is perhaps the first of London’s other rivers that would come to mind for many, owing largely to the fact that the Olympic Park for the 2012 London Olympics was located in the lower Lea valley in Stratford, East London. The river itself, which flows from its source near Luton, through Hertfordshire and North London into the Thames at Bow Creek, is modest in comparison with the capital’s main artery however it still has a significant imprint on the London landscape. The old river has carved out a valley which cuts through the north east of London and although now drained, is responsible for a number of marsh areas such as those at Hackney and Tottenham. Unlike many of the other rivers mentioned so far, the Lea, owing to its greater size and position, has been harnessed by man for industry rather than being lost to sewers and development. As a result it still flows through East London in the man-made channels which would have serviced local mills for hundred of years.

© Stuart Mitchell 2012
For those who are interested in moving to London you can click here. If you already live in London are looking to improve your organisation’s online presence you may be in need of a London web agency.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

A Beginners Guide to Popular CMSs - Part 1: Open Source

Image representing Drupal as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase
From the first time online publisher to the multinational corporation, a significant proportion of the websites that exist on the world wide web today, perhaps around a third, are constructed using what are broadly known as Content Management Systems or CMSs. There are a vast array of CMSs available to any potential web site owner - many free, some commercial products. The following article looks at a few of the most popular, their strengths and weaknesses and what their technical requirements are from a web hosting platform.

What is a CMS?
The abbreviation CMS is short for Content Management System and the name conveys what is at the heart of these tools - they are systems which web authors can use to manage the content of a web site or web application. Many of the forerunners of today’s CMS were created as simple off-the-shelf packages which allowed users to run their own blogs and the concepts are still inextricably linked. However, from humble beginnings most have evolved to offer much more than that, to the extent that they are now heavily used by the even the most experienced web developers as the building blocks of advanced websites, utilising extensive support communities and wide ranging plugins and modules. They can therefore provide the uninitiated with an easy route into online publishing within minutes but also provide advanced users with valuable efficiencies and reliability in contrast with coding websites from the ground up.

The three most widely deployed content management systems on the world web today all use PHP (PHP Hypertext Processor) as the server side scripting language (the code that is run on a server and determines what data is delivered when a web page is requested). The first part of this article looks at these three CMSs.

WordPress
This CMS is recognised as the most used CMS on the web with estimates that it comfortably accounts for over a half of all CMS builds - almost two thirds in some surveys. The CMS began life as a blogging platform and is still, in its basic form, orientated towards this function, however a broad array of plug-ins and themes means that it also has the potential to be used for more complex web sites. Therefore, WordPress has become massively popular with personal bloggers and corporate web developers alike.

  • Created: 2003
  • Original use: Blogging platform
  • Licence: Open Source (GPL)
  • Popularity*:
    • 59% of CMSs
    • 17% of Websites
  • Server-side script: PHP
  • Database systems: MySQL
  • Hosting OS: Various
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Easy to create basic website and/or blog
    • Large community support
    • Extensive plug-in system for additional functionality
    • Customisable themes which change functionality as well as appearance
    • In-built CSS and PHP editing
  • Concerns:
    • Basic themes can make basic sites appear similar
  • Examples:
Joomla!
Formed as an offshoot of the older CMS Mambo in 2005, Joomla has gone on to be the second most used system on the web accounting for around 1 in 10 CMS builds (1 in 40 of all sites). It is particularly popular with those looking for a (free) powerful yet simple system that requires little or no knowledge of code but that allows flexible control over the site’s look and feel.


  • Created: 2005
  • Original use: CMS
  • Licence: Open Source (GPL)
  • Popularity*:
    • 10% of CMSs
    • 3% of Websites
  • Server-side script: PHP
  • Database systems: MySQL; MSSQL; PostgreSQL
  • Hosting OS: Various
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Flexible template functionality to easily customise the look and feel site wide
    • Inbuilt SEO & tracking capabilities
    • Large extensions library to extend functionality and templating options
    • Often available as a one click installation from web hosts
    • Good usability for beginners/non-developers
  • Concerns:
    • Lacks ability to format uploaded media such as images
    • Lacks versioning to store and revert to old versions of content
  • Examples:

Drupal
Created originally as a forum platform, Drupal has become very popular due to its flexibility and is now used to build a wide array of website applications. The ‘out of the box’ Drupal build is known as the core and allows the user to add content to build a simple website, blog or forum, but the site is supported by an extensive community and it is the add-on modules that they create which gives Drupal its potential. Drupal is therefore commonly referred to as a content management framework due to its reliance on add-ons for functionality.

  • Created: 2001
  • Original use: Message Board
  • Licence: Open Source (GPL)
  • Popularity*:
    • 8% of CMSs
    • 2% of Websites
  • Server-side script: PHP
  • Database systems: Various
  • Hosting OS: Various
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Modular design for adding and managing additional functionality
    • Extensive number of modules available to enhance functionality
    • Taxonomy system for organising and display related content
    • Large community for support and module development
  • Concerns:
    • Can be demanding on hosting platforms due to Queries
    • The administration pages in older versions aren’t user friendly
    • The core installation is light on functionality (see benefits)
  • Examples:
    • http://www.whitehouse.gov/
    • http://www.economist.com/

If you are interested in getting a site built in one of the CMSs mentioned above then you can visit Digital Design London or for those looking for a hosting platform for their new site, visit VDC Hosting.
Enhanced by Zemanta

A Beginners Guide to Popular CMSs - Part 2: .NET & Commercial

Having provided an overview of the three most common PHP based CMSs in the preceding installment, the following begins with two of the most prevalent systems to be based on the .NET framework for their server-side scripting, and concludes with a further two commercial systems which are also amongst the web’s most popular.

Although most CMSs are based upon the open source PHP server-side scripting language, as mentioned in the first part of the article, there are still a significant number that utilise coding and languages based within the .NET framework, as developed by Microsoft...

DotNetNuke
This is the most widely used of the .NET based systems on the internet today as well as being one of the most stable and developed because of its relatively long history. It is maintained by the DotNetNuke corporation as an open source project and is currently available under free open source licences and enhanced commercial licences. The CMS itself utilises modules to extend functionality and skins to manage theming/templating for the look and feel of a site.
  • Created: 2003 (2002 as IBuySpy)
  • Original use: CMS
  • Licence: Open Source (MIT) / Commercial Proprietary
  • Popularity*:
    • 2% of CMSs
    • <1% of Websites
  • Server-side script: ASP.NET
  • Database systems: SQL Server
  • Hosting OS: Microsoft
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Versions available to suit beginners and advanced developers
    • Modules for extending functionality
    • Allows multi-site management from one installation
    • Community support available
    • Commercial support available (see below)
  • Concerns:
    • Cost of commercial versions and modules
  • Examples:
Umbraco
The second of the featured .NET CMSs is Umbraco. This system is perhaps more targeted at web developers as it requires some knowledge of coding to get up and running, but for those who use it, it can provide high levels of flexibility in realising web designs because it utilises only standard frameworks, languages and protocols rather than introducing any limitations. As with the DotNetNuke, it is available in both a streamlined free open source licence and enhanced commercial versions.
  • Created: 2004
  • Original use: CMS
  • Licence: Open Source (MIT) / Commercial Proprietary
  • Popularity*:
    • <1% of CMSs
    • <1% of Websites
  • Server-side script: ASP.NET
  • Database systems: SQL Server; MySQL
  • Hosting OS: Microsoft
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Provides a .NET framework for developers
    • Uses standard templating formats and protocols
    • Flexibility for site development and customisation (see above)
    • Commercial support available
  • Concerns:
    • Limited out-of-the-box for beginners/non-developers
    • Limited user management capabilities
    • Cost of commercial product
  • Examples:


The most deployed CMS, including the three for the article’s first installment, tend to be based upon open source frameworks and therefore free - a fundamental factor behind their popularity - whilst others offer enhanced commercial versions open source packages (see above). However, there are a good number of commercial CMS products available to consumers and some of these are amongst the most used on the web, despite their costs.

vBulletin
One of the longest lived of content management systems still in use on the web, vBulletin is in truth most suited to delivering message boards and forums, and is the most popular system for doing so, however it also brings an extensive array of functions into play and can easily be used for wider web development. Indeed it is particularly suited to building websites and blogs with good message board integration.
  • Created: 2000
  • Original Use: Message Board
  • Licence: Commercial Proprietary
  • Popularity*:
    • 3% of CMSs
    • 1% of Websites
  • Server-side script: PHP
  • Database systems: MySQL
  • Hosting OS: Various
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Specifically designed for forums and discussion boards
    • Provides blogging and CMS functions in addition
    • Rich with forum features and blog integration
  • Concerns:
    • Cost of licence
    • Requires PHP editing during install
    • Number of functions can be overwhelming
  • Examples:
ExpressionEngine
This powerful CMS was developed by EllisLab back in 2004 taking inspiration from an earlier attempt at a blogging platform and delivers a wealth of well developed functionality as well as flexibility owing to years of commercial development combined with underlying open source frameworks.
  • Created: 2004
  • Original use: Blogging Platform/CMS
  • Licence: Commercial Proprietary
  • Popularity*:
    • 1% of CMSs
    • <1% of Websites
  • Server-side script: PHP
  • Database systems: MySQL
  • Hosting OS: Various
  • Benefits/Features:
    • Commercially developed and supported
    • Open source framework allows custom development
    • Good and easy user management and administration capabilities
    • Rich in functionality both out of the box and with add-ons
    • Allows multi-site management from one installation
  • Concerns:
    • Expense/cost of licences and add-ons
  • Examples:
If you are interested in getting a site built in one of the CMSs mentioned above then you can visit Website Design London or for those looking for a hosting platform for their new site, click here.
Enhanced by Zemanta